Data Transparency
CMS Indicator Data Availability Details
In-depth details of data availability from all Main Indicators to the Method level over the last 3 years.
Maximum Limit
100%
23 Root Indicators
Year 2026
0.00%
Data Availability
Year 2025
4.75%
Data Availability
Year 2024
12.16%
Data Availability
Assessment Breakdown Table
Each row represents an indicator structure. A check mark indicates data is available.
| CODE | CMS INDICATOR STRUCTURE | WEIGHT | 2026 | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Protection and Conservation of Forests and Their Ecosystems | 4.348% | 0.000% | 0.155% | 0.155% |
| 1.1 | Permanent Forest Protection | Max 0.621% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Calculate the portion of conservation areas or protected areas above the total district area based on the RTRWK to the total area of protected and conservation forests specified in the Decree on determining protected and conservation areas. | 0.621% |
|
|
|
|
| 1.2 | Protection of Areas Important for Ecological Services | Max 0.621% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Percentage of the total area designated with a protection function in the spatial plan from the total area of essential ecosystem zones (KEE) within the district. | 0.621% |
|
|
|
|
| 1.3 | Protection for Peatlands | Max 0.621% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Calculating the portion of peat area included by the regional government in the RTRWK protected area against the area of peat land with a protected function determined by the Ministry of Forestry | 0.621% |
|
|
|
|
| 1.4 | Percentage of conformity of built gardens with RTRW related to plantations | Max 0.621% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Calculating the suitability of built gardens with RTRW related to plantations. | 0.621% |
|
|
|
|
| 1.5 | Ecosystem Conservation | Max 0.621% | 0.000% | 0.155% | 0.155% |
| 1.5.1 | Extent of HCV/HCS areas for nature conservation | Max 0.155% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Calculate the area of high priority areas (eg HCV/HCS) mapped for conservation in the landscape | 0.155% |
|
|
|
|
| 1.5.2 | ANKT area in the plantation area | Max 0.155% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Calculate the area of ANKT/forest cover maintained in the Plantation Designated Area | 0.155% |
|
|
|
|
| 1.5.3 | Availability of comprehensive biodiversity management data in plantation areas | Max 0.155% | 0.000% | 0.155% | 0.155% |
| Metode Prepare reports on the identification and management of biodiversity in plantation areas | 0.155% |
|
|
|
|
| 1.5.4 | The area of ANKT/forest cover maintained in Other Designated Areas (APL) – Village ANKT | Max 0.155% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Calculate the area of ANKT/forest cover maintained in the Other Use Area (APL) – Village ANKT | 0.155% |
|
|
|
|
| 1.6 | Ecosystem Restoration | Max 0.621% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| 1.6.1 | The area (hectares) of natural ecosystems restored in East Kutai | Max 0.311% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Calculate the area (hectares) of natural ecosystems restored in East Kutai | 0.311% |
|
|
|
|
| 1.6.2 | Area of critical and very critical land and status of ownership/control being rehabilitated in the APL area | Max 0.311% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Inductively identify the area of critical and very critical land as well as ownership/control status in the APL area | 0.311% |
|
|
|
|
| 1.7 | Regional regulations/policies to protect, conserve and improve ecosystems and the environment | Max 0.621% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Availability of regional regulations/policies that regulate: - No new planting on peatlands, regardless of depth, after 15 November 2018 and all peatlands are managed responsibly. - Land clearing does not cause deforestation or destruction of any areas required to protect or enhance HCVs or HCS forests. | 0.621% |
|
|
|
|
| 2 | Prevention of forest and land fires | 4.348% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| 2.1 | The area that is not burned every year in East Kutai | Max 1.087% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Percentage of area that is not burned each year, both during extreme and normal years from the base year [Forest area and APL] | 1.087% |
|
|
|
|
| 2.2 | Prevention and control of fires in plantation areas | Max 1.087% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Calculating the percentage of burnt area in plantation areas (2030 target: 0.5%) | 1.087% |
|
|
|
|
| 2.3 | Prevention and control of fires in plantation areas | Max 1.087% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Calculate the number of plantation companies that are monitored and evaluated in implementing their obligations to control land and plantation fires. | 1.087% |
|
|
|
|
| 2.4 | Community participation in preventing and controlling land and garden fires | Max 1.087% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Counting the number of Fire Concerned Farmer Groups (KTPA) located around oil palm plantations who are alert to prevent land and plantation fires | 1.087% |
|
|
|
|
| 3 | Environmental Quality Control | 4.348% | 0.000% | 0.870% | 1.739% |
| 3.1 | Environmental Quality Control | Max 0.870% | 0.000% | 0.870% | 0.870% |
| Metode Environmental Quality Index Score | 0.870% |
|
|
|
|
| 3.2 | Compliance Score | Max 0.870% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Environmental compliance score | 0.870% |
|
|
|
|
| 3.3 | Plantation waste processing | Max 0.870% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.870% |
| Metode Number of companies that process and utilize plantation waste for land applications and energy sources | 0.870% |
|
|
|
|
| 3.4 | Utilization of biogas as an energy source | Max 0.870% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode The number of companies that use biogas from liquid waste as an energy source | 0.870% |
|
|
|
|
| 3.5 | Energy Conversion | Max 0.870% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode The amount of energy converted from processed liquid waste | 0.870% |
|
|
|
|
| 4 | Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation | 4.348% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| 4.1 | Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation | Max 4.348% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Assessing based on the existence of climate change adaptation/mitigation plan documents at the district level [RAD GRK] | 4.348% |
|
|
|
|
| 5 | Land Control (Tenurial) by the Community | 4.348% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| 5.1 | Proportion of Land Control by Independent Smallholders | Max 4.348% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Calculate the area of land managed by independent smallholders divided by the total area of plantation land in East Kutai | 4.348% |
|
|
|
|
| 6 | Organizing Farmers/Plantations | 4.348% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.483% |
| 6.1 | Registration of Independent Farmers (SKT/STDB) | Max 1.449% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| 6.1.1 | Target land area planned for SKT/STDB sustainable plantations in East Kutai | Max 0.725% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Calculate the mapped area (hectares) to be included in the SKT/STDB plan for sustainable plantations in East Kutai | 0.725% |
|
|
|
|
| 6.1.2 | Number of farmers registered with SKT/STDB for sustainable plantations | Max 0.725% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Calculating the number of farmers registered with SKT/STDB/E-STDB for sustainable plantations | 0.725% |
|
|
|
|
| 6.2 | Planters/Farmers Group | Max 1.449% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.483% |
| 6.2.1 | Planters/farmers who are members of associations/groups | Max 0.483% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.483% |
| Metode Calculating the number of planters/farmers who are members of the Association/Group of Self-Help Planters/farmer groups (all commodities) | 0.483% |
|
|
|
|
| 6.2.2 | Independent Palm Oil Planters in groups | Max 0.483% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Calculate the percentage of independent (oil palm) farmers in groups | 0.483% |
|
|
|
|
| 6.2.3 | Palm Oil Cooperatives that have an Internal Control System (ICS) | Max 0.483% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Calculate the number of Palm Oil cooperatives that have an Internal Control System (ICS). | 0.483% |
|
|
|
|
| 6.3 | Assistance for Independent Farmers | Max 1.449% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| 6.3.1 | Extension staff adequacy ratio | Max 0.290% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Calculate the ratio of the number of extension workers compared to the total number of independent smallholders | 0.290% |
|
|
|
|
| 6.3.2 | Number of community and company self-help extension workers | Max 0.290% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode "Count the number of instructors community and corporate self-help in counseling for Planters palm oil | 0.290% |
|
|
|
|
| 6.3.3 | Agricultural improvement practices (GAP) training assistance | Max 0.290% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Number and type of farmer beneficiaries and community members who receive training and capacity development on agricultural improvement practices (GAP) and/or income generation | 0.290% |
|
|
|
|
| 6.3.4 | ISPO Training Package Assistance | Max 0.290% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Number of Farmers who have taken part in the ISPO training package (institutional, cultivation, GAP, ICS, etc.) | 0.290% |
|
|
|
|
| 6.3.5 | Access to funding for smallholder palm oil rejuvenation | Max 0.290% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Calculating the number of planters who have access to funding for smallholder plantations/oil palm rejuvenation | 0.290% |
|
|
|
|
| 7 | Food security | 4.348% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 4.348% |
| 7.1 | Food security | Max 4.348% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 4.348% |
| Metode Assess district food security through the Food Security Index | 4.348% |
|
|
|
|
| 8 | GRDP Contribution to the Plantation Sector | 4.348% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| 8.1 | GRDP Contribution to the Plantation Sector | Max 4.348% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Value and percentage contribution of GRDP from the Plantation Sector to the total GRDP of East Kutai | 4.348% |
|
|
|
|
| 9 | Land and Plantation Productivity | 4.348% | 0.000% | 3.727% | 4.348% |
| 9.1 | The company's palm oil productivity | Max 0.621% | 0.000% | 0.621% | 0.621% |
| Metode The company's FFB palm oil productivity [ton/ha/year] | 0.621% |
|
|
|
|
| 9.2 | Independent smallholder oil palm productivity | Max 0.621% | 0.000% | 0.621% | 0.621% |
| Metode FFB oil palm productivity partnership/independent farmers [ton/ha/year] | 0.621% |
|
|
|
|
| 9.3 | People's rubber productivity | Max 0.621% | 0.000% | 0.621% | 0.621% |
| Metode People's rubber productivity [tons/ha/year] | 0.621% |
|
|
|
|
| 9.4 | Rubber productivity of the company | Max 0.621% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.621% |
| Metode Company rubber productivity [tons/ha/year] | 0.621% |
|
|
|
|
| 9.5 | Cocoa productivity | Max 0.621% | 0.000% | 0.621% | 0.621% |
| Metode Cocoa productivity [tons/ha/year] | 0.621% |
|
|
|
|
| 9.6 | Pepper productivity | Max 0.621% | 0.000% | 0.621% | 0.621% |
| Metode Pepper productivity [ton/ha/year] | 0.621% |
|
|
|
|
| 9.7 | Sugar palm productivity | Max 0.621% | 0.000% | 0.621% | 0.621% |
| Metode Pepper productivity [ton/ha/year] | 0.621% |
|
|
|
|
| 10 | Downstreaming and Supply Chain Efficiency | 4.348% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 1.087% |
| 10.1 | Availability of plantation commodity maps | Max 1.087% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Identifying and mapping the distribution of plantation commodities in East Kutai | 1.087% |
|
|
|
|
| 10.2 | Availability of palm oil supply chain data in East Kutai | Max 1.087% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Identifying and mapping the palm oil supply chain in East Kutai | 1.087% |
|
|
|
|
| 10.3 | Increase in the Exchange Rate for People's Plantation Plantation Farmers (NTPR) | Max 1.087% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 1.087% |
| Metode Calculating the Exchange Value of People's Plantation Plantation Farmers (NTPR) | 1.087% |
|
|
|
|
| 10.4 | Number of plantation processing business actors | Max 1.087% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Calculate the number of plantation processing business actors | 1.087% |
|
|
|
|
| 11 | Supply Chain Partnerships | 4.348% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| 11.1 | Corporate partnerships and independent smallholders | Max 1.449% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Counting plantation business actors who have partnerships with independent planters (especially partnerships selling garden products) | 1.449% |
|
|
|
|
| 11.2 | Realization of partnership (plasma) obligations between companies and palm oil planters | Max 1.449% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Percentage of realization of partnership (plasma) obligations of companies and oil palm planters in East Kutai | 1.449% |
|
|
|
|
| 11.3 | Monitoring evaluation of the Implementation of Palm Oil Plantation Business Partnerships | Max 1.449% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Assessing the Implementation of Palm Oil Plantation Business Partnerships | 1.449% |
|
|
|
|
| 12 | Recognition of Indigenous Law Communities | 4.348% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| 12.1 | Recognition of Indigenous Law Communities | Max 4.348% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Calculate the proportion of customary land area that has been recognized based on the Regent's Decree/Regional Regulation which is reported or registered to the Ministry of Environment and Forestry to the total area of customary land in the district based on the indicative customary forest map issued by the Ministry of Environment and Forestry | 4.348% |
|
|
|
|
| 13 | Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) | 4.348% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| 13.1 | Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) | Max 4.348% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) Integrated in the Plantation Licensing Application Process | 4.348% |
|
|
|
|
| 14 | Land and Agricultural Conflict Resolution | 4.348% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| 14.1 | Availability of SOPs for Handling Conflicts | Max 2.174% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Existence of SOPs for Handling Land and Agricultural Conflicts at the district level government | 2.174% |
|
|
|
|
| 14.2 | Number of conflicts in the plantation sector that facilitated follow-up resolution | Max 2.174% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Percentage of plantation sector conflicts that facilitated follow-up resolution | 2.174% |
|
|
|
|
| 15 | Fair Employment Practices | 4.348% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| 15.1 | Reducing plantation labor conflicts | Max 4.348% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Percentage of the number of plantation labor conflicts | 4.348% |
|
|
|
|
| 16 | Sustainable Land Use Planning | 4.348% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| 16.1 | Availability of DDDTLH and/or RPPLH studies in the district | Max 1.087% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Existence of DDDTLH and/or RPPLH documents in East Kutai | 1.087% |
|
|
|
|
| 16.2 | Availability of land use balance sheet | Max 1.087% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Existence of documents/data, balance sheet data related to land use in East Kutai | 1.087% |
|
|
|
|
| 16.3 | Issuance of the East Kutai Regional Regulation concerning the Implementation of Sustainable Plantations | Max 1.087% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Identify the existence of East Kutai Regional Regulations regarding the Implementation of Sustainable Plantations | 1.087% |
|
|
|
|
| 16.4 | Extent and Type of Beneficiaries involved in production practices and/or livelihoods; implementation of improved agricultural and forestry practices | Max 1.087% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Number of farmers and community members mapped to be involved in production practices and/or livelihoods | 0.543% |
|
|
|
|
| Metode The area (hectares) that has been committed farmers implementing agricultural practices for improvement and forestry practices | 0.543% |
|
|
|
|
| 17 | Proportion of Regency Budget Allocated for Sustainability | 4.348% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| 17.1 | Proportion of Regency Budget Allocated for Sustainability | Max 4.348% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Calculate the percentage of the budget allocated for environmental functions to the total district budget stated in the APBD each year | 4.348% |
|
|
|
|
| 18 | Access to Public Information | 4.348% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| 18.1 | The existence of an Information and Documentation Management Officer (PPID) is good for district level agencies that regulate the sector | Max 2.174% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Regional government regulations (Perda) or Regional Head Decrees (SK Bupati) appointing PPIDs in agencies tasked with regulating the agricultural sector or for the entire district government | 2.174% |
|
|
|
|
| 18.2 | Credible data management and monitoring system to support the East Kutai Sustainable Jurisdiction | Max 2.174% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Developing an integrated system of one data and one map for measuring East Kutai's sustainable jurisdictional indicators | 2.174% |
|
|
|
|
| 19 | Complaints Mechanism | 4.348% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| 19.1 | Complaints Mechanism | Max 4.348% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Assessing the implementation of the National Public Service Complaint Management System – People's Online Aspiration and Complaints Service (SP4N-LAPOR) by the district level government | 4.348% |
|
|
|
|
| 20 | Sustainable Land Use and Plantations | 4.348% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| 20.1 | Certified Sustainable Plantation (ISPO, RSPO, RA, etc.) | Max 4.348% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Calculating the percentage (%) between the total plantation area and certified APL (ISPO, RSPO, RA, etc.) compared to the total plantation area and APL in the district | 1.087% |
|
|
|
|
| Metode Calculating the number of companies certified by ISPO, RSPO, RA, etc. | 1.087% |
|
|
|
|
| Metode Calculating the Number of Independent Smallholders certified by ISPO, RSPO, RA, etc. | 1.087% |
|
|
|
|
| Metode Calculating the number and type of beneficiaries whose livelihoods have improved. (average household income) | 1.087% |
|
|
|
|
| 21 | Multi-Stakeholder Participation in District Planning | 4.348% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| 21.1 | Multi-Stakeholder Participation in District Planning | Max 4.348% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Identify the existence of Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for community participation in spatial planning and mid-term and annual district development plans as an effort to reduce the possibility of tokenism in the public participation process. | 4.348% |
|
|
|
|
| 22 | Multistakeholder Institutions | 4.348% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| 22.1 | Multi-stakeholder institution (Forum) for sustainable development | Max 1.449% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Assess the existence of inclusive multi-stakeholder partnerships developed within the initiative to ensure realization and sustainability of results | 1.449% |
|
|
|
|
| 22.2 | Sustainable Plantation Communication Forum | Max 1.449% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Issuance of the East Kutai Regent's Decree regarding the Sustainable Plantation Communication Forum | 0.725% |
|
|
|
|
| Metode Availability of PKB Work Plan | 0.725% |
|
|
|
|
| 22.3 | Collaborative Forum for KEE and Protected Area management | Max 1.449% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Establishment of a Collaborative Forum for the management of KEE and Protected Areas | 1.449% |
|
|
|
|
| 23 | Implementation of PUP (Plantation Business Appraisal) | 4.348% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| 23.1 | A cross-sector Legal Compliance Working Group was formed in East Kutai Regency | Max 1.449% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Establishment of a cross-sector Legal Compliance Working Group in East Kutai Regency | 1.449% |
|
|
|
|
| 23.2 | Implementation of PUP (Business Assessment Plantation) | Max 1.449% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Measuring the quality of plantation businesses through the Plantation Business Assessment, namely the ratio of the number of companies that get class I (Very Good) and II (good) scores to the total plantation companies in a district. | 1.449% |
|
|
|
|
| 23.3 | Evaluation and supervision of palm oil permits | Max 1.449% | 0.000% | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Metode Calculating the number of Location Permits, IUPs and HGUs for Palm Oil Plantations evaluated | 1.449% |
|
|
|
Assessment Information
All indicators are calculated with a maximum total value of 100%. Each Main Indicator (Root) is distributed evenly to sub-indicators () and their measurement methods (). A method obtains its full percentage weight () if there is proving data/document in the relevant evaluation year.